Maxed Out

Because the System i can run at redline speed all day long . . .

May 7, 2008

Revisiting the New Power Names

Ian Jarman, who is now the manager of Power Systems Software for IBM, was reading Maxed Out and noticed my disdain over the "i for Business" phrase, as well as my softer, more positive side on the new Power-related logos. So in a proactive move, he set up a conference call to go over the latest IBM naming conventions, which I'll share here, because, hey, these name changes are confusing. Besides, I've got some really great news.

In referring to what was formerly known as i5/OS, IBM i is the official product name, and that's a deliberate pairing of both terms -- IBM and i -- so that it will show up well in Web searches. In its own publications, IBM will typically use IBM i at least on the first reference, thought it's also possible to use i separately when referring to the operating system or the OS-related world, like i applications, i community, i solutions, or i running on a 520. logosr08_170x105.jpg

As for specific releases, that's IBM i 6.1, i 6.1, i 5.4, or even just 6.1.

"One thing that we never use is 'i for Business'," Jarman noted. "That's just in the logo."

So, thankfully, "i for Business" is not part of the official name, and in fact, it has more to do with trademark issues in the logos than it does with promoting the heritage of i5/OS. It turns out that "i" is quite popular as a trademark element, as is "i" inside of a circle for logo usage. IBM had to find a way to create a logo that wouldn't infringe on other logos, and including "for Business" helped. Plus, that little underline slash graphic . . . same deal.

The unintended side effect of the tweaked logo is actually good for the i world -- it distinguishes i from AIX and Linux, properly positions the OS as an operating system for business, and it creates a logo that's harder to glance over or ignore.

"The whole purpose [of the logos] is to bring together the marketing and branding of our software under Power Systems Software, and that's going very well because we want to raise the profile of all this, and in particular, raise the profile of PowerVM because that's a new brand -- and better position the operating systems as a group that run on Power Systems," Jarman explained.

PowerVM, by the way, is the new brand for the logical partitioning that System i customers have been using since 1999 -- so the underlying core of it isn't new to the System i world. More importantly, PowerVM is the special mojo that makes the Power System so flexibly strong.

Posted by cmaxcer at May 7, 2008 8:17 AM

Comments

OK, OK we got it . . . "i". Fancy logo, Power everything, kind of like WebSphere everything. Now how about some information on the new developer tools? What exactly is in each tool set; what are they calling each package; and what is the cost of each package? A month ago this seemed to still be fluid. Are there any IBM documents that explain in detail what the new developer roadmap is?

Posted by: Chuck Thimm at May 7, 2008 4:13 PM

My only sticking point with all of this naming/renaming is that IBM has never (and now may never have to) promoted the System/38, AS/400, iSeries, System i and now just i very well. It is pretty much common knowledge among us i bigots (that looks strange!) that our favorite platform has fallen off of the TV screens never to be seen again (or has it ever). We see all kinds of ads from others about their boxes, and some IBM ones about their blade servers, but even those don't mention they can run i OS (still looks strange).

Granted TV is not the only venue to advertise midrange or any other major server platform, and may not be the primary place the decision makers in IT look for information. However, we bigots who make them run and love them and keep those decision makers happy and employed, do watch TV and could do very well in assisting IBM (or a competitor) sell their solution to the big guys after enough of us see those TV ads that sell the servers. All of those people might influence a decision and if they never see or hear about the i in the commercials and take an interest when they see the ad again in a trade magazine, won't offer up the i as a possible solution when the big guys ask for opinions.

Oh, yea - one other quirk. It's really a pain having to convince my word processing and e-mail software to accept a lower case i by itself without wanting to capitalize it all of the time. Life is tough!!

Posted by: Denny McAvoy at May 7, 2008 4:24 PM

Actually, an ad campaign featuring the Power platform vs a Windows Server, along the lines of the 'Apple vs PC' ads would be interesting! No separate application, file and print servers, no DBA, high reliability and availability.

Hmmmm!

Posted by: Mike Devine at May 7, 2008 7:13 PM

"Power platform vs a Windows Server"...

Sounds like a winner to me!

Posted by: jtaylor at May 8, 2008 7:46 AM

I don't think i will work and they will be going through another round of renaming it. Let the Rochester guys name their system. They are much more creative than any of IBM Marketing's gurus.

Posted by: Dan Miller at May 8, 2008 9:43 AM

Chuck,

The System i Roadmap has become the System i (okay, that should be the IBM i) Road Atlas. It can be found at: http://www-03.ibm.com/systems/i/roadmap/

You can also go to http://www.ibm.com and search for announcement letters 208-016 and 208-018. These are dated January 29, 2008.

I think these give a good picture of the development tools for IBM. As for pricing, I don't think it's changed much since the announcements. RDi (Rational Developer for i) is $795. RBD (Rational Business Developer) is $3000. RDi-SOA which supposedly combines RDi and RBD is $2000.

There have been statements made about a trade up or exchange from ADTS (PDM, SEU, RLU, etc.) to RDi, but I've never heard anything definitive.

Posted by: Michael at May 8, 2008 2:46 PM

Since the announcement of yet another change in the naming and support structure for i, we have seen at ASNA an increasing amount of organizations contacting us about their i strategy going forward and the option of extending or modernizing their RPG applications to .NET.

There seems to be a growing apprehension in the community and they don't seem to like yet another i story. In addition, the very fact that Denny refers to "Power Platform vs a Windows Server" shows just how far Microsoft has come in building the perception of .NET as a viable enterprise competitor to i, even amongst i loyalists.

Marketing of the new i will really have to be extra special to reduce the growing uncertainty around i, especially given the seemingly viable alternative to i available in .NET.

Posted by: David Leichner at May 8, 2008 11:56 PM

As an AS/400, iSeries, i5, i programmer, I have but one question: What is an IBM Marketing guru?




[*Note from Chris: As of the moment of this typing, I'm sitting in front of my laptop, laughing ruefully -- not a bad way to start the day. ]

Posted by: ed anderson at May 9, 2008 6:34 AM

Post a comment




Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style)

Chris Maxcer
August 2008
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
          1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30
31            

Blog Policy

Our blogs are editorial content of System iNetwork. We welcome your comments and opinions and encourage lively debate on the issues, and we reserve the right to edit all postings for clarity, length, civility of tone, and appropriateness to the topic under discussion. Comments consisting of product or job solicitations and other spam, profanity, and extreme rudeness will be deleted. We also reserve the right to publish excerpts from the blogs in our e-mail newsletters and print magazine.

ProVIP Sponsors