Maxed Out

Because the System i can run at redline speed all day long . . .

January 4, 2009

Share the POWER in 2009?

In the latest issue of COMMON.CONNECT, the official print publication of COMMON, President Randy Dufault brings up an interesting point: he ran into an old friend and former co-worker who had moved to a different job in a different state. Dufault's message is straightforward: as times have changed, his friend's mid-sized IT organization had changed, too. The company his buddy worked for was running AIX, Windows, and Linux servers in addition to an i-based system.

The i-based system, however, was overtaxed and running out of time to complete month-end batch processing. So the basic question was, should the company upgrade the i or add Capacity On Demand . . . or upgrade to a new POWER6-based system and use it to run their AIX workloads alongside their i-based workload.

In this scenario, IBM i could likely tap into unused resources from AIX partitions during month-end processing.

Of course, what if those colleagues responsible for AIX wanted a little extra i processing power, too? So that's the rub, isn't it? Sharing resources? Getting along virtually inside a single box. . . . Sounds nice from the outside looking in, but what if you're stuck on the inside?

So Here's My Question

If you had the opportunity to upgrade to IBM i 6.1 running on a brand spankin' new Power System . . . but had to share the box with your AIX and Linux-runnin' colleagues, would you rather stay on your existing System i . . . or go with the new shared hardware?

Posted by cmaxcer at January 4, 2009 10:38 PM

Comments

In our environment we would(in fact we are planning to) go with the new shared hardware.

Posted by: Spiro Barouxis at January 5, 2009 12:17 PM

I would share.

It seems obvious that IBM wishes to have a unified platform and at some point we will not have a choice (probably now).

To have the new i servers considered as a separate platform will be very tough in today’s market.

So, if I had a choice, I would choose to share (starting with DEV systems) now so we can learn both sides of the power house and learn how to solve the companies issues together and not just the i issues the company faces.

The career path also seems clear - legacy on power until the latest power OS takes over be that i, aix, linux, or something totally new.

Posted by: Michael Frilot at January 5, 2009 12:28 PM

I would share and hope to learn the AIX OS.

Posted by: at January 5, 2009 1:11 PM

I agree with Michael ... I don't think we have much of a choice. There are advantages to the merger if you have to run mixed environments but consider this:

I have managed a system i / AIX on a 570 before POWER. The one thing I can tell you is with all the hype about AIX efficiencies it took 6 processors to run and analytical package, Websphere and it management module. The entire Line of Business took 4 and the Financials ran on 2 (including Websphere). Every time I turned around the AIX package need more memory, processor and other resources. We ended up taking resources out of the system i to feed AIX growing needs. Yes, AIX was doing a huge and complex and algorithm for trend analysis but the same data exact data was being processed on the system i every day and being slice and diced a reassembled into user friendly chunks . AIX had to support a handful of users … system i had over 1500!

The point is though the AIX O/S may seem lean and cost effective, it is not when you put it all together and try a run something like an enterprise (the same thing that others have found out trying to convert an enterprise to the word most popular PC O/S). The hidden cost of tuning and other over head ate up more than my 570's resources; it ate up my time, attention and staff.

Posted by: Bill Phillips at January 5, 2009 1:38 PM

I would jump at a chance to go to the new power 6 hardware even if I would have to share.

Yes, I have a great concern about the AIX taking over the processors on the machine but with the direction that IBM has set forth we really do not have a choice.

Besides, I might be able to pick up a few tricks as the HMC is really a LINUX appliance and so it all ties together in the end.

IBM i vs Unix oh well if you cannot bet them then join them and IBM has made sure we will never beat them which is really just greed on the part of the american way of life :-)

Posted by: Bruce Battersby at January 7, 2009 2:29 PM

Post a comment




Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style)

Acceptable Use Policy

Chris Maxcer
Blog Feed

December 2009
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
    1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31    

Blog Policy

We welcome your comments and opinions and encourage lively debate on the issues. However, Penton Media reserves the right to delete or move any content that it may determine, in its sole discretion, violates or may violate its Terms of Use or is otherwise unacceptable. For more information, see Penton Media's Terms of Use.

ProVIP Sponsors